MITRA MANDAL GLOBAL NEWS

पानी की एक नई अवस्था की खोज

Authentic news,No fake news.


Ria.ru पर पढ़ें
MOSCOW, 17 सितंबर - RIA नोवोस्ती। सुपरकूल पानी एक में दो तरल पदार्थ होते हैं। यह निष्कर्ष अमेरिकी शोधकर्ताओं द्वारा तापमान पर पहली बार तरल पानी की माप को उसके सामान्य हिमांक से काफी नीचे ले जाने के बाद पहुँचा। शोध के परिणाम साइंस जर्नल में प्रकाशित होते हैं 
इसकी अत्यधिक व्यापक घटना के बावजूद, एक रसायन के रूप में पानी अभी भी पूरी तरह से समझा नहीं गया है। कभी-कभी वैज्ञानिक इसे पृथ्वी का सबसे रहस्यमय पदार्थ कहते हैं।
तथ्य यह है कि पानी अन्य तरल पदार्थों की तरह नहीं है - जब यह जमा होता है, तो यह फैलता है, और हर किसी की तरह, अनुबंध नहीं करता है, जबकि इसका घनत्व कम हो जाता है। इसलिए, पानी की बर्फ डूबती नहीं है, लेकिन सतह पर तैरती है। पानी में एक उच्च क्वथनांक होता है और यह एक उत्कृष्ट विलायक है, इसलिए, विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में, अधिकांश कार्बनिक और अकार्बनिक पदार्थ इसमें घुल जाते हैं। अंत में, इसमें एक विशाल सतह तनाव गुणांक है। इन सभी अद्वितीय गुणों के लिए धन्यवाद, पानी पृथ्वी पर जीवन का आधार बन गया है।
पानी में एक और दिलचस्प गुण है - यह बहुत "अनिच्छा से" जमा देता है। यदि अन्य तरल पदार्थ धीरे-धीरे एक ठोस अवस्था में गुजरना शुरू करते हैं, जब वे ठंड बिंदु से गुजरते हैं, तो पानी "आखिरी" हो जाता है। और जमना शुरू करने के लिए, इसे हमेशा क्रिस्टलीकरण नाभिक की आवश्यकता होती है - खनिज या कार्बनिक मूल के निलंबित कण।
यूएस डिपार्टमेंट ऑफ एनर्जी के पैसिफिक नॉर्थवेस्ट नेशनल लेबोरेटरी (पीएनएनएल) के शोधकर्ताओं ने यह जांचने का फैसला किया, अगर ऐसे कोई कण नहीं हैं, तो पानी किस तापमान तक तरल रहेगा।
स्थापना जहां सुपरकंडक्टर को लैंथेनम और हाइड्रोजन से संश्लेषित किया गया था - रूस समाचार एजेंसी, 1920, 09.09।
"अजीब धातुओं" का रहस्य। वैज्ञानिकों ने पदार्थ की एक नई अवस्था की खोज की है
यह ज्ञात है कि पानी बहुत कम तापमान पर भी सुपरकोलड ड्रॉप्स के रूप में बादलों में मौजूद हो सकता है, और फिर, जब ठीक बर्फ धूल ऊपर से इन बादलों में हो जाती है, तो उच्च और ठंडा परतों से, बूंदें तुरंत क्रिस्टलीकृत होती हैं और बर्फ के टुकड़ों के रूप में जमीन पर गिर जाती हैं ।
प्रयोगशाला में वैज्ञानिकों ने एक पतली बर्फ की फिल्म को एक लेजर के साथ नष्ट कर दिया, जिससे सुपरकूल तरल पानी बनाया गया, और फिर इन्फ्रारेड स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी का उपयोग करके तापमान परिवर्तन के सभी सबसे छोटे चरणों को 135 से 245 केल्विन - माइनस 138 से माइनस 28 डिग्री सेल्सियस तक ट्रैक किया।
चरण के राज्यों के "फ्रीज फ्रेम" में, वैज्ञानिकों ने देखा कि जब सुपरकोलिंग, पानी घने तरल चरण में संघनित होता है, जो सामान्य तरल चरण के साथ सह-अस्तित्व में रहता है। इस मामले में, 190 से 245 केल्विन के तापमान में वृद्धि के साथ एक उच्च घनत्व वाले तरल का अनुपात तेजी से घटता है।
", हमने दिखाया है कि बहुत कम तापमान पर तरल पानी न केवल अपेक्षाकृत स्थिर है, बल्कि दो संरचनात्मक रूपों में भी मौजूद है," सह-लेखक ग्रेग किमेल ने एक प्रेस विज्ञप्ति में कहा। क्या गहराई से सुपरकूल पानी हमेशा क्रिस्टलीकृत होता है, इससे पहले कि इसका जवाब न हो। "
लेखक प्रयोगात्मक रूप से यह साबित करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति थे कि सुपरकूल पानी स्थिर दो-चरण तरल-तरल अवस्था में हो सकता है, और चरण अनुपात तापमान के साथ बदलता रहता है। पहले, यह माना जाता था कि हाइपोथर्मिया के दौरान, पानी अनिवार्य रूप से समय के साथ एक ठोस अवस्था में बदल जाता है।

US Poll Predictions and Presidential Politics in the American Polity

Authentic news,No fake news.

SINGAPORE, Sep 7 2020 (IPS) - The US residential polls are akin to a drama that is staged every four years in which the American are actors on stage and the rest of the world is the audience. With one major difference, however. While in a usual theatrical performance the viewers are there mostly for amusement, though some may be enlightened and enriched by the experience, in the case of the US elections, unlike in others, their fates are inextricably linked to the outcome of the play. This is not predetermined by any playwright, though it can often be predicted. It is not implausible therefore for some on-lookers to want to intervene in what’s happening onstage. It must be done discreetly, and with great circumspection. Take for instance, the Russians in the American elections in 2016. The Russians and President Donald Trump hotly dispute allegations of any such interference.

Dr. Iftekhar Ahmed Chowdhury

Unsurprisingly, there is a great deal of intellectual resources devoted to model-building in order to be able to predict election outcome. The purpose is to develop a methodology superior to mere crystal -ball gazing. So many caveats are often entered into the exercise that robs it of major value. In the US, elections are ultimately decided according to votes cast by the electoral college of 538, comprised of representatives from the States. So, the magic number for victory is 270. Each State chooses its own electors, and these members of the electoral college vote on a ‘winner take all basis’. In other words, if a majority of the voters from a State vote for one candidate, all electoral college votes from that State are meant to be cast in favour of that candidate. Electoral college vote results may not, therefore, as they have not in some cases in the past, reflect the winner in terms of national popular votes.

For the purposes of prediction, the prestigious British journal ‘The Economist’ has developed a somewhat complex model indicating Mr Joe Biden of the Democratic Party as the winner. At writing, it is giving 91.7% chance of electoral victory and 98% chance of popular majority to Mr Biden. The Financial Time’s tally for Biden stood at 298. Professor Allan Lichtman of the American University and author of “The keys to the White house”, who has accurately predicted every Presidential electoral outcome correctly since 1984 using “13 key factors”, has predicted Mr Biden will win. In the ancient times, Greek and Roman drama-writers used a concept called “deus ex machina’, literally god out of a machine, in their scripts. This is an unexpected power originating from the gods, is introduced which alters the course of the narration.

It seemed for a while that nothing short of a divine intervention, a remote likelihood for Mr Trump in the view of his detractors, could save him from certain defeat. But then the race began to tighten, partly caused by apprehensions in some quarters with regard to the social unrest currently sweeping America, and Mr Trump’s repeated reassertion of Jeremiads against violence .Given the dichotomized and divided nature of the American electoral , both sides have loyal bases who will vote in accordance with their a priori views, come what may. So, the contest is basically for the minds and hearts of 8 to 9 % who are still undecided. These are the potential Biblical ‘Sauls on the Road to Damascus’ of the electorate, the potential converts to the other side. That is also the percentage point of Mr Biden’s current lead. So even if Mr Trump should win over most of the undecided numbers, which in itself is a stretch, Mr Biden would still have an edge.

This has encouraged Mr Trump to fight back. Unlike in the UK where the system of governance usually follows a culture of “good- chap model”, whereby political actors conform to a code of conduct perceived to be virtuous, no such tradition appears to shape American political behaviour. The absence of European-style feudalism that helped inspire such norms in the ‘old world’ might have impeded the development of such values in the immigrant political milieu of the ‘new world’. Mr Trump has provided a supreme example of this phenomenon almost all through his entire first term in office. He capped it at the Republican National Convention by using the White House, always seen as an apolitical institution (a ‘Peoples’ House’) as the venue for his speech accepting Party nomination for his second term of the presidency. Past occupants of the official residence of the president of the United states have abstained, indeed recoiled from politicizing what is largely accepted as a national symbol of unity Because of these reasons, the framers of the US Constitution had thought it wise to put down in writing the details of how the polity should be governed. They were wary of putting their trust entirely trust entirely on intrinsic human morality. Their faith in God did not extend to the faith in their own ilk. They were uncertain if their fellow-Americans would be able to rule democratically within a framework of established tradition of good governance unless a written Constitution set-out the guidelines. They were wise, but apparently not comprehensive enough. They left sufficient gaps and loopholes for the system to be gamed by politicians of lesser virtuous pedigree.

The equivalent of the US President in Britain is, not the Queen, but the Prime minister. Across the Atlantic the Prime Minister is the ‘primus inter pares” or first among equals who governs with the aid and joint responsibility of a Cabinet of colleagues. In the US the Secretaries, often termed Cabinet-officers rather than Cabinet–members, are, though appointees of the President, are approved by the Senate. As heads departments they are loosely equated with British Ministers. But they are not colleagues of the President in a political sense and become a part of their department whose role is apolitical. For instance, the top diplomat in Washington the Secretary of State does not while performing duties at home and abroad, associate his office with domestic politics. Recently, the current incumbent, Mike Pompeo, blatantly broke that rule, by politically using a trip to Jerusalem to advance the President’s political aspiration publicly.

According to British public service culture, as also in many democracies, officials shun active politics. In the US such behaviour was written into law. The Hatch Act of 1939 prohibits employees of the federal government, except for the President and Vice President, in engaging in some form of political activities. But nowadays some allege that it is being honoured more in the breach than the observance. Many elements of democracy, such as voting rights for all, came later in the US than is often realized. The author and historian Michael Beschloss worries that unless these are protected they may also erode quickly. The incredibly sad consequence would be what the Fathers of the Republic wanted to avoid foremost, a descent into tyranny. Any law has content and spirit. The spirit is often equally important.

Take the question of leaving office. In Britain, should a Prime Minister lose the elections, or be defeated in a vote of no-confidence in the House of commons, he or she would proceed to the Palace, either kiss the Queen’s hands or offer her a curtsy and resign office. For this politician, it would not mean a withdrawal from politics, and thereby would be less painful. Office is seen as merely a privilege to serve the community. In America on the other hand for the President calling quits is forever, hence there is a burgeoning view that given Trump’s disinclination to conform to ‘good chap ‘ behaviour , he may drag his feet at leaving office , particularly if the results are close , alleging electoral fraudulence. The Biden crowd is suggesting if that be the case, the military would, or should, march Trump out of office. The US military has experience of marching several foreign Presidents out of office, but never one of its own. That would indeed be a unique experience!

While the component States of the American Union is largely governed by the Governors, foreign policy is the President’s domain. Given the military and economic clout of the US, their politics often become central to our concerns. Hence the need for the world beyond the US to understand, assess and evaluate them. For instance, a re-election of Mr Trump would mean a further retreat of the US into “Fortress America” and a greater disengagement from the world. On the other hand, a Biden Administration would mean a greater engagement, with other nations, multilateral institutions and issues such as Climate Change and Arms Control. That is why a US Presidential election generates a degree of interest in say India, Pakistan or Bangladesh as in Hawaii, Nebraska or North Carolina.

Text-books in Civics and Comparative politics, particularly in the Anglo-Saxon world, often tend to differentiate the British and American systems, sometime a tad simplistically, as being ‘Parliamentary’ ‘and ‘Presidential’ forms of governance. The French, with their own mixed form, never quite played along with this idea. That was also before China came to salience with their model of government based on ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics”, which no one else follows till now, but is important because China is. The Indian example is too chaotic to be recognized as a norm.

Writing his classic work ‘The English Constitution’ in 1867, Walter Bagehot argued a Constitution needed two parts: a ‘dignified’ one, to ‘excite and preserve the reverence of the population’ and the other , an ‘efficient’ part , ‘to employ that homage in the work of the government’. In Britain the two parts were sought to be kept distinct and to date has operated more or less smoothly. In the US they became, somewhat of a mixed hodgepodge. Around the mid- nineteenth century, a French political observer visiting America, de Tocqueville, perceived a discernible difference between appearance and reality in America. So, while trying to rid the new world of the tyranny of a King, were the framers of the US Constitution inadvertently creating an Emperor? Some may ponder. Confronted with such a question, Mr Trump might nonchalantly respond, “it is what it is”!

Dr Iftekhar Ahmed Chowdhury is Principal Research Fellow at the Institute of South Asia Studies, National University of Singapore. He is a former Foreign Advisor (Foreign Minister) of Bangladesh and President of Cosmos Foundation Bangladesh. The views addressed in the article are his own. He can be reached at: isasiac @nus.edu.sg

This story was originally published by Dhaka Courier

Human rights groups ask IOC to move Olympics from China

Authentic news,No fake news.

Human rights groups ask IOC to move Olympics from China

China’s repression in Tibet, the status of the exiled Dali Lama and its treatment of ethnic minorities spurred violent protests ahead of Beijing’s 2008 Olympics

TOKYO -- China's repression in Tibet, the status of the exiled Dalai Lama and its treatment of ethnic minorities spurred violent protests ahead of Beijing's 2008 Olympics.

It could happen again.

Beijing is to host the 2022 Winter Olympics with rumblings of a boycott and calls to move the games because of alleged human rights violations.

A coalition of human rights groups delivered that demand to International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach ahead of the body's executive board meeting in Switzerland on Wednesday. In a letter, the group asked the IOC to “reverse its mistake in awarding Beijing the honor of hosting the Winter Olympic Games in 2022.”

The letter said that the 2008 Olympics had failed to improve China's human rights record, and that since then, it has built “an Orwellian surveillance network” in Tibet and incarcerated more than a million Uighurs, a mostly Muslim ethnic group, in the Xinjiang region. It listed a litany of other alleged abuses from Hong Kong to the Inner Mongolia region, as well as the intimidation of Taiwan.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian accused the groups of trying to politicize sports, which he said is against the spirit of the Olympic Charter.

China has repeatedly denied human rights abuses. It at first said the camps for Uighurs didn't exist and then said they were job training centers to combat terrorism.

“Through vocational education and training, Xinjiang has taken preventive counter-terrorism and de-radicalization measures, effectively contained the once frequent terrorist activities, and protected the right to life, health and development of all ethnic groups," another spokesperson, Hua Chunying, said last week. "Over the past four years there hasn’t been a single terrorist attack in Xinjiang.”

The IOC argued the 2008 Olympics would transform China and improve its human rights record. Instead, they are often compared to Hitler's 1936 Berlin Olympics; an authoritarian state using the games as a stage.

A Washington Post editorial this month suggested China should lose the Olympics. “The world must ask whether China, slowly strangling an entire people, has the moral standing to host the 2022 Winter Olympics," it said. "We think not.”

These are precarious times for the Swiss-based IOC. Its finances — and those of 200 national Olympic committees and dozens of Olympic-related sports federations — have been shaken by the postponement of the Tokyo Olympics until 2021 because of COVID-19.

Bach warned two months ago against boycotts but said he was not referring specifically to Beijing. The Swiss-based body generates 73% of its revenue from selling television rights and 18% from sponsors and has seen its income stalled by the Tokyo delay.

After European cities such as Oslo and Stockholm dropped out, the IOC was left with only two bidders for 2022: Beijing and Almaty, Kazakhstan. Beijing won by four votes, taking the Winter Olympics to a country with no tradition — but a giant, untapped market.

Juan Antonio Samaranch Jr., the IOC member who oversees the Beijing Games, declined to answer questions from The Associated Press about reported human rights violations in Xinjiang and referred to comments from the IOC.

“Awarding the Olympic Games to a national Olympic committee does not mean that the IOC agrees with the political structure, social circumstances or human rights standards in the country,” the IOC said in an email to the AP.

The IOC said it has “received assurances that the principles of the Olympic Charter will be respected in the context of the games." It added it must remain “neutral on all global political issues.”

The IOC included human rights requirements in the host city contract for the 2024 Paris Olympics, but it did not include those guidelines — the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights — for Beijing. Paris is the first Olympics to contain the standards, long pushed for by human rights groups.

“NGOs, celebrities and other activist groups will put tremendous pressure on China in the run-up to the games calling for boycotts, etc.,” Victor Cha, a former White House adviser on Asia, said in an email to the AP. “I think the IOC would be very reluctant to take 2022 away from Beijing."

China is also the host for the 2022 Asian Games in Hangzhou.

Athletes have shown their power in supporting Black Lives Matter protests in the United States and elsewhere. German soccer player Mesut Ozil, a Muslim with Turkish roots, has spoken out against China and coined the phrase: “Muslim Lives Matter.” He has been critical that Muslim-majority countries like Indonesia and Malaysia have remained silent.

Murray Hiebert, a senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that such countries don't want to jeopardize their economic ties with China, including the infrastructure investment they get.

“Indonesia was very critical of Myanmar when it expelled some 750,000 Muslim Rohingya refugees to Bangladesh in late 2017 and early 2018, but officials have said little about the Uighur situation in China,” he said.

The IOC is under pressure to revise a rule that prohibits political protests on podiums at the Olympics.

Casey Wasserman, who heads the organizing committee for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, said he has written to Bach and asked him to reform the rule. “I don't believe anti-racist speech is political speech,” he said this month.

Mary Harvey, the CEO of the Swiss-based Centre for Sport and Human Rights, said athletes protesting against racism and inequality in the United States should have the same rights in Beijing, or in Tokyo.

But Lee Jones, who researches Asian politics at Queen Mary University of London, said athletes were unlikely to speak up. The Winter Olympics are much smaller than the Summer Games, with few Muslim athletes taking part.

“Most sportsmen and women seem to want to separate sport and politics, unless they are directly implicated, like in athletic activism in the U.S.,” he wrote in an email.

Jones said, though, that the growing criticism of China's human rights record by foreign governments — notably the U.S. and some European countries — makes the situation potentially more serious for China than 2008, when the campaign was largely driven by Tibet activist groups.

The campaign of U.S. presidential candidate Joe Biden has backed the use of the term “genocide” for China's actions in Xinjiang.

Jones said boycotts are unlikely to change China’s behavior, but China might move if it sees its reputation damaged, particularly in Muslim-dominated countries.

“China has reacted furiously to any suggestion that it is even mistreating the Uighur population, let alone committing genocide," he said. "So, it likely to react very negatively indeed if other governments start to lead a boycott campaign.”

Belarusian riot police disperse protesters in downtown Minsk

Authentic news,No fake news.

MINSK, September 1. /TASS/. Units of the Belarusian riot police (OMON) have dispersed protesting students in downtown Minsk on Tuesday, detaining several people, TASS reports from the scene. There were about 200 protesters.

A group of students began to march from the Belarusian National Technical University to the center of Minsk at about 11 am local time (same as Moscow time) carrying white-red-white flags. When the students approached the Victory Square in downtown Minsk, they were blocked by OMON units.

Several protesters have been detained, with some of the students moving towards the Minsk State Linguistic University. Police is pushing the remaining protesters away from the square. The Victory Square metro station is closed for entry and exit.

Russia may develop the 6th-generation fighter jet

Authentic news,No fake news.

MOSCOW, September 1. /TASS/. Russia may develop the 6th-generation fighter jet under the MiG-Sukhoi joint brand, Rostec Aviation Cluster Industrial Director Anatoly Serdyukov said on Tuesday.

"Possibly, this will be so: the fighter produced by the MiG-Sukhoi. But so far, all the work is at the stage of discussions and it is early to speak about details," Serdyukov said in an interview with RBC media group, replying to a question about the brand, under which the new fighter would be created.

Then-Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Dmitry Rogozin announced in March 2016 that Russia had launched work on the sixth-generation combat plane. Rogozin said at the time that the Sukhoi Design Bureau had submitted a preliminary project "for creating the sixth-generation fighter."

Among the typical characteristics of the sixth-generation fighter, specialists note its capability to perform combat missions without human participation and its artificial intelligence, the availability of a radio-photonic radar, the ability to develop hypersonic speed and fly into the near-Earth space and employ weapons based on new physical principles.

Russian Aerospace Force Ex-Commander-in-Chief, Chairman of the Federation Council’s Defense and Security Committee Viktor Bondarev earlier told TASS that the Russian Armed Forces would be switching to the sixth-generation hardware, including strike drones, smoothly and gradually, after getting convinced in the reliability of previous-generation aircraft.

अतीत में मृतकों की हड्डियों के साथ क्या ?

Authentic news,No fake news.


एक महिला का दफन, कई लोगों की हड्डियों के साथ, जो 60-170 साल पहले उसकी मृत्यु हो गई थी - रूस समाचार एजेंसी, 1920, 09/01/2020
एक महिला का कई लोगों की हड्डियों के साथ दफन होना, जिनकी मृत्यु 60-170 साल पहले हुई थी
मॉस्को, 1 सितंबर - आरआईए नोवोस्ती। ब्रिटिश वैज्ञानिकों ने कांस्य युग की खोजों का उपयोग करते हुए, पहले प्राचीन लोगों की मानव परंपरा को कई पीढ़ियों के लिए अवशेष के रूप में संरक्षित करने की परंपरा का वर्णन किया, और कभी-कभी रोजमर्रा की जिंदगी में उनका उपयोग करते हैं। शोध के नतीजे पत्रिका पुरातनता में प्रकाशित हुए हैं 
लंदन में फ्रांसिस क्रिक इंस्टीट्यूट में सेंटर फॉर बायोमेडिकल रिसर्च और यूनिवर्सिटी कॉलेज डबलिन में पुरातत्व के वैज्ञानिकों ने मानव हड्डियों से बनी प्राचीन कलाकृतियों की जांच के लिए रेडियोकार्बन डेटिंग और कंप्यूटेड टोमोग्राफी तकनीकों का इस्तेमाल किया है।
"आधुनिक धर्मनिरपेक्ष समाजों में भी, मानव अवशेषों को विशेष रूप से शक्तिशाली वस्तुओं के रूप में देखा जाता है, और कांस्य युग के लोगों के लिए यह सच प्रतीत होता है। लेकिन उन्होंने उन तरीकों से मृतकों का इलाज किया जो आज हमारे लिए अकल्पनीय और यहां तक ​​कि डरावना हैं।" लेख के पहले लेखक डॉ। थॉमस बूथ हैं।
पूर्वोत्तर इंग्लैंड के विंडमिल फील्ड्स में, पुरातत्वविदों ने एक 4,500 साल पुरानी दफन की खोज की है जिसमें एक महिला को कम से कम तीन अन्य लोगों की खोपड़ी और हड्डियों के साथ दफनाया गया है। इसके अलावा, ब्रिस्टल विश्वविद्यालय के केमिकल स्कूल में किए गए रेडियोकार्बन डेटिंग के परिणामों को देखते हुए , वे सभी उसकी तुलना में 60-170 साल पहले मर गए।
शोधकर्ताओं का मानना ​​है कि पूर्वजों या अन्य परिचितों और सम्मानित लोगों के अवशेषों को रखना उनकी स्मृति को सम्मानित करने का एक तरीका था।
पुरातत्वविदों ने पत्थर के टुकड़ों की खोज की है जो ब्रिटिश आइल्स - रूस समाचार में आज कला के शुरुआती काम हो सकते हैं
ब्रिटिश पुरातत्वविदों का मानना ​​है कि उन्हें कला के सबसे पुराने काम मिल गए हैं
"लोगों ने स्पष्ट रूप से उन लोगों के अवशेषों को रखा जिन्होंने उनके जीवन या उनके समुदाय के जीवन में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाई थी, या जिनके साथ उनका एक निश्चित संबंध था - परिवार के सदस्य, व्यापारी, दोस्त या दुश्मन हो। शायद यह एक ऐसा अवशेष था जिसने उन्हें याद दिलाया। एक व्यक्ति के बारे में और उसके बारे में बात करना संभव बना दिया, "बूथ कहते हैं।
एक अन्य मामले में, स्टोनहेज के पास, इंग्लैंड के दक्षिण-पश्चिम में विल्टशायर में एक दफनाने के लिए मानव-मादा से बना एक बांसुरी-प्रकार का हवा का उपकरण मिला। ध्यान से उकेरी गई और पॉलिश की गई कलाकृतियाँ अन्य वस्तुओं के साथ-साथ कब्र में थी - पत्थर और कांसे की कुल्हाड़ियाँ, एक हड्डी की प्लेट, एक टस्क और एक अनोखा सेरेमोनियल दांतेदार वस्तु।
मृतक की हड्डियों की रेडियोकार्बन डेटिंग के परिणामों की तुलना और संगीत वाद्ययंत्र ने वैज्ञानिकों को यह मानने की अनुमति दी कि दफन व्यक्ति अपने जीवनकाल के दौरान जानता था कि किसकी हड्डी से उपकरण बनाया गया था।
"मानव हड्डियों के टुकड़े न केवल कब्र के सामान में शामिल थे, बल्कि रहने वाले घरों में भी रखे गए थे, जिन्हें फर्श के नीचे दफन किया गया था और प्रदर्शित किया गया था," अध्ययन के नेता जोआना ब्रुक ने कहा, यूनिवर्सिटी कॉलेज डबलिन में पुरातत्व विभाग और ब्रिस्टल विश्वविद्यालय में मानव विज्ञान और पुरातत्व विभाग में प्रोफेसर हैं। "इससे पता चलता है कि कांस्य युग के लोग मानव अवशेषों को उस डरावनी या घृणा के साथ नहीं देखते थे जो आज हम महसूस करते हैं।"
लेखकों ने सूक्ष्म स्तर के टोमोग्राफी का भी उपयोग किया, यह पता लगाने के लिए कि सूक्ष्म स्तर पर, किसी व्यक्ति के मरने के बाद शव को कैसे संभाला गया।
परिणामों से पता चला कि कुछ शवों का अंतिम संस्कार किया गया था और फिर उन्हें नष्ट कर दिया गया था, कुछ हड्डियों को दफनाने के बाद उतारा गया था, और कुछ शवों को जमीन पर सड़ने के लिए छोड़ दिया गया था।
वैज्ञानिकों के अनुसार, इससे पता चलता है कि कांस्य युग में निकायों को संभालने के लिए कोई स्थापित प्रोटोकॉल नहीं था, और किसी व्यक्ति की मृत्यु के बाद शरीर के साथ क्या करना है, इसके बारे में निर्णय किया गया था।
वैज्ञानिकों का कहना है कि मृतकों के अवशेषों को रखने और उनकी पूजा करने की परंपरा आज तक बची हुई है, लेकिन पवित्र अवशेषों के सम्मान के विपरीत, हमारे दूर के पूर्वजों ने उन अवशेषों पर अधिक ध्यान दिया है जो जीवित हैं

Mitra-mandal Privacy Policy

This privacy policy has been compiled to better serve those who are concerned with how their  'Personally Identifiable Inform...