MITRA MANDAL GLOBAL NEWS

Coal mining news

Two West Virginia coal mines cited during MSHA inspections in April


Federal inspectors issued a total of 82 citations and three orders to 10 U.S. coal mines during April 2016 special impact inspections.
Two West Virginia coal mines were among the 10 cited mines, including Panther Creek Mining’s American Eagle Mine in Kanawha County and Rockwell Mining’s Gateway Eagle Mine in Boone County, which each received three citations.
The American Eagle Mine previously received 16 citations during special impact inspections conducted in March.
Omega Holdings’ Huffman Highwall in Buchanan County, Virginia, which borders Mingo and McDowell counties in West Virginia, was cited the most last month, receiving 23 citations.
Also bordering Mingo County, Inspiration Resources’ Mine No. 5 in Pike County, Kentucky, followed the Huffman Highwall with 15 citations and three unwarrantable failure orders.
During the Inspiration Resources inspection, inspectors issued orders for an inadequate pre-shift examination, failure to water down roadways to prevent dust, and too-wide entries on the mechanized mining unit. According to the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration, violations exposed miners to serious hazards associated with roof falls, equipment accidents and respirable coal dust. Among the hazards associated with the citations were mine fires, electrical shock, inadequate ventilation, explosive environments and black lung, MSHA noted.
Virginia Conservation Legacy Fund’s Oak Grove Mine in Alabama made the list as well, receiving 11 citations. VCLF, through its affiliate Seneca Coal Resources, bought the Oak Grove Mine and the Pinnacle Mine in Wyoming County, West Virginia, from Cliffs Natural Resources in December 2015.
The remaining citations were issued to coal mines in Ohio, Kentucky, Illinois and Wyoming.
Three metal/non-metal mines in Iowa, Montana and California also received eight citations and three orders during the April inspections.
Special impact inspections, which began after the fatal Upper Big Branch mine explosion in April 2010, are conducted at mines that merit increased agency attention and enforcement due to their poor compliance history or particular compliance concern.

Trump Picks North Dakota Lawmaker as Key Energy Advisor

Donald Trump, presumptive Republican nominee for president, has chosen a back-bench Republican congressman with a lot of experience in state energy regulation as his advisor on energy issues, according to multiple media accounts. Rep. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota is the Trump energy advisor, likely to play an important role in a Trump administration if the GOP candidate is elected in November.
Cramer told Reuters that Trump asked him to produce a “white paper” on energy policy. Trump has planned an “energy summit” in Bismarck on May 26. According to North Dakota’sGrand Forks Herald newspaper, “Trump has been light on details of his energy policy so far, though he recently told supporters in West Virginia that the coal industry would thrive if he were president.” Thanks to hydraulic fracturing in the Bakken shale formation, North Dakota has led a boom in U.S. oil production.
The newspaper described Cramer, 55, as “one of the country’s most ardent oil and gas advocates and climate change skeptics.” Trump has claimed that global warming is a hoax “created by and for the Chinese” to harm American business. Cramer endorsed Trump earlier this year.
Kevin Cramer was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2012 and is North Dakota’s only representative. He serves on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which has the broadest jurisdiction of any committee in Congress. Rep. Cramer is assigned to three subcommittees: Communications and Technology, Environment and the Economy, and Oversight and Investigations. Source: http://cramer.house.gov/about/full-biographyKevin Cramer was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2012 and is North Dakota’s only representative. He serves on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which has the broadest jurisdiction of any committee in Congress. Rep. Cramer is assigned to three subcommittees: Communications and Technology, Environment and the Economy, and Oversight and Investigations. Source: http://cramer.house.gov/about/full-biography
Cramer has held the state’s at-large congressional district since 2012 and sits on the Natural Resources and Science and Technology committees. He served on the North Dakota Public Service Commission (PSC), which regulates utilities, from 2003 to 2012.
Cramer has been a Republican activist since his 20s and became state party chairman in 1991 at the age of 30. He made a run for Congress in 1996, challenging sitting incumbent Democrat Earl Pomeroy and lost. He ran against Pomeroy again in 1998, losing again. Republican Gov. John Hoeven (elected to the U.S. Senate in 2010) appointed Cramer to the regulatory commission in 2003 and he was elected to a six-year term in 2004.
In 2010, Cramer announced he would make another run for the state’s congressional seat, and became a Tea Party favorite. But the state party convention gave the GOP nomination to Rick Berg, who won the election in November. Cramer won reelection to a second PSC term.
Berg in 2012 announced he would retire and run for the Senate seat that Democrat Kent Conrad was leaving. Berg lost narrowly to Democrat Heidi Heitkamp. Cramer decided to run for the congressional seat for the fourth time, defeating a fellow member of the PSC in a GOP primary, and won in the general election. He repeated that feat in 2014.
Cramer was reportedly among a group of Trump advisers who recently met with lawmakers from Western states who hope that the candidate, if elected, will open more federal land for drilling, a lawmaker who took part in the meeting said. According to multiple media reports, Cramer said in an interview that his white paper “would emphasize the dangers of foreign ownership of U.S. energy assets, burdensome taxes, and over-regulation.”
Kennedy Maize is a long-time energy journalist and frequent contributor to POWER.

NBN plays important role in Ipswich’s future 20th May 2016

MANY parts of regional Australia have suffered as a result of the end of the mining boom and decline of local manufacturing.
Regions like Ipswich, which once thrived in these prosperous industries, are experiencing the 'brain drain' - unable to attract and retain skilled workers as employment opportunities diminish and businesses that once defined these areas disappear.
These communities have been served a challenge; how do they reinvent and reinvigorate themselves in order to stay relevant, competitive and attractive in this changing environment?
Fortunately, local Australian small businesses are tackling this challenge head-on. Ipswich is a prime example - once known as a cradle for coal mining and railway infrastructure.
The area has undergone a major shift in its economic landscape, diversifying towards a serviced-based economy where knowledge and information are crucial in driving business growth and productivity.
What's happening in places like Ipswich is indicative of the transformation taking place across a number of regional Australian towns.
Our ever-changing digital landscape combined with the breakdown of traditional industries is facilitating innovation, creativity and entrepreneurship as vibrant businesses disrupt and challenge the status-quo.
Access to new technologies and fast broadband is helping to drive a movement of 'Silicon Suburbs' in
regional Australia led by bold entrepreneurs.
We've already begun to see the benefits of access to the NBN network in regional towns as the expanding footprint now reaches more than quarter of the roll out and is scheduled to be completed within the next few years.
I've seen first hand in places like Ipswich, how the tech start-up explosion has replaced what was once a coal mining hub with young entrepreneurs taking the chance on a new business idea from their hometown.
We're now increasingly seeing businesses improve their productivity by going completely 'virtual' as files, administration, emails, communication and accounting are digitally recorded and accessible any time, anywhere in the cloud.
These applications and the growing ability to drive sales by offering e-commerce services is predicted to see a $4b boost to our Gross Domestic Product each year.
Job growth, innovation and opportunity are no longer restricted to businesses within the major cities.
Universal access to fast broadband will allow small and medium businesses in the region to enjoy similar access to their big city counterparts.
With the roll out of the NBN network set to be complete by the year 2020 a digital future is imminent - Ipswich is set to thrive if businesses choose to accept the challenge.
BEN SALMON GM Business NBN

Miners fear federal coal reforms jeopardize rural Utah

"Coal is still the backbone of the nation's energy supply. Restricting access to this affordable and abundant resource will destroy jobs and lead to higher and higher electric bills for every American," said Mark Compton, president of the Utah Mining Association, speaking inside the hearing. "If we are going to raise the standard of living here in the U.S. and around the world, coal must remain part of our energy mix."
But the industry's critics believe the federal government sells publicly owned coal too cheaply without consideration of coal mining's environmental footprint and coal combustion's impact on climate change. Environmentalists insist the Bureau of Land Management should restructure the way it sells coal leases and sets royalty rates, while also doing more to rein in coal's "external" costs: greenhouse-gas emissions, and degraded air and lower water quality and eroding wildlife habitat.
"Why would we not choose to capture the sun directly and in its cleanest form? The answer is change is hard — hard for miners' families trying to make a living in the boom-and-mostly-bust industry, hard for politicians beholden to fossil fuel interests and for power companies' bottom lines," Paul Zuckerman told BLM officials at the Salt Palace.
Thursday's hearing was the second of six planned nationwide as the Interior Department conducts its "programmatic environmental impact statement" for reforming the nation's coal program, which taps publicly owned reserves.
About 42 percent of the nation's coal comes from lands administered by the BLM and the U.S. Forest Service, mostly in Western states. In Utah, 83 percent of coal production is extracted from federal leases. At the end of 2015, the BLM administered 308 coal leases on 475,000 acres. Utah's share is 72 leases on 84,553 acres holding about 200 million tons, enough to sustain current levels of production for at least 13 years.
In January, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell announced the reform initiative and imposed a three-year moratorium on new coal leases. The initiative arises as the coal industry faces unprecedented challenges — demand has plummeted in the face of cheap natural gas and concerns about coal's impact on the climate.
A short-term leasing pause is not expected to disrupt mine operations, yet many pro-coal speakers Thursday implored the BLM to lift the moratorium. Utah expects to challenge it in the courts, according to Laura Nelson, director of the governor's energy-development office.
"BLM's actions threaten several major coal mine expansion projects, including the Sufco and Alton Coal mine expansions, which have spent years complying with expensive environmental reviews and other permitting requirements in good faith, only to discover that the BLM is changing the rules on them," Nelson said.
Officials heard diametrically opposed narratives Thursday as dozens of speakers paraded to the mic to give their three minutes' worth.
Many of the speakers were employees of the three mines owned by Bowie Resource Partners, Utah's largest coal producer. According to Corey Heaps, the general manager of Skyline, his mine employs 339 on a payroll totaling $35 million. The mine, which straddles the Sanpete-Carbon county line, pays $67 million to vendors and is responsible for a total economic benefit of $129 million.
But critics like Ryan Alexander of Taxpayers for Common Sense say industry has had a sweet deal for too long. Federal leases sometimes sell for 40 cents per ton at auctions where there is one bidder. Producers pay annual rents of $3 per acre and royalties of 8 percent, or 12.5 percent if the coal is surface mined.
These rates were set in 1976 and are in desperate need of updating, Alexander said.
All 530 seats in the Salt Palace hearing room were filled, many by miners clad in yellow shirts proclaiming their allegiance to coal. Pro-coal attendees outnumbered environmentalists about three- or four-to-one.
Utah's U.S. Reps. Jason Chaffetz and Chris Stewart, both Republicans, expressed dismay that the hearing wasn't held in Price, the capital of Utah coal country, whose communities will be most affected by the coal-program overhaul.
The agency must consider coal's many benefits in terms of well-paying jobs, low power rates and revenues to local governments, Chaffetz said through his energy adviser, Kelsey Berg. Chaffetz likened the study to "a witch hunt," looking for problems where none exist.But coal's critics say you don't have to look far to detect problems. Audits have discovered coal companies pay below-market rates to lease coal reserves, underpay royalties and are not always adequately bonded. And now companies are falling into bankruptcy in the face of a collapsing coal demand, raising the possibility that taxpayers will be on the hook for mine reclamation.
Montana rancher Steve Charter, a past president of the North Plains Resource Council, runs cattle over a mine outside Billings.
"For the past 40 years, I have had a ringside seat to personally witness the broken federal program that has allowed coal companies to take advantage of loopholes and giveaways and avoid accountability at the expense of taxpayers, land, air and wildlife," Charter said. "This deeply flawed system has not ensured mined land is reclaimed and aquifers restored. Out of a total of 562 square miles of mined land across Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and North Dakota, only 14 percent has been fully reclaimed."
But many speakers, like Scofield Town Council member Carol Levanger, claimed coal mining's impacts are overstated and royalties ought to be lowered to encourage further production. Levanger's town, population 26, on the Wasatch Plateau has seen active mining on and off since 1877.
"I dare say some would think that place ought to be a barren wasteland. It would be looking like raped land. It does not. It is green, it is beautiful. There is hunting, there is fishing," said Levanger, who works at Skyline. "The mine water runs right behind my house. The dogs play in it. There are fish in the stream. The fish are healthy. They taste good, and I haven't grown a third eyeball yet."
The sessions continue in Knoxville, Tenn., on May 26; Seattle on June 21; and Grand Junction, Colo., on June 23. The BLM is accepting written comments until July 28.
Brian Maffly covers public lands for The Salt Lake Tribune. Maffly can be reached at bmaffly@sltrib.com or 801-257-8713.

U.S. to Hear Concerns Over Coal Mines’ Self-Bonding By Patrick Rucker and Tracy Rucinski

The United States is considering whether to reign in a subsidy on coal mine cleanup costs and in so doing shield taxpayers from those liabilities, a leading regulator for the mining industry said on Wednesday.
The program, known as self-bonding, has allowed some of the country’s largest coal companies to avoid putting aside cash, bonds or other securities that are typically required to cover future mine cleanup costs. Instead, self-bonding allows a company to use its balance sheet as collateral – a problem when that company goes bankrupt.
Peabody Energy, Arch Coal and Alpha Natural Resources have all gone bankrupt in the last 10 months and left behind roughly $3.6 billion in self-bond liabilities, according to securities filings.
Environmentalists have warned officials that coal-producing states in the west left the self-bonding program open to abuse and the Office of Surface Mining and Reclamation Enforcement (OSMRE) on Wednesday said that it would investigate those concerns.
“I’d recommend that states decide not to accept any new self-bonds given the current situation in the coal industry,” OSMRE director Joe Pizarchik told reporters on a conference call.
Self-bonding may save a coal company money in bankruptcy but also day-to-day since every dollar that the government insures is a dollar that does not require private financing.
Peabody and Arch Coal were not immediately available for comment, while Alpha Natural declined to comment.
Following a complaint by WildEarth Guardians, Pizarchik said the regulator would open a 30-day comment period on Friday to hear public concerns about self-bonding.
“We think it’s good to solicit broader public feedback, but we hope (officials) will to move quickly to fix the problems around self-bonding,” said Jeremy Nichols of WildEarth Guardians.
Coal-producing states have discretion in accepting self-bonds and any change to the law, which dates to 1977, would have to be approved by Congress, a process that could take years.
In the meantime, Pizarchik said, officials would closely examine dealings between coal companies and states – some of which have snuffed out self-bonding.
“We don’t know whether there is collusion or anything else but I think the public has the right to know why were (some states) successful in replacing self-bonds while other states weren’t,” Pizarchik said.
(Reporting by Patrick Rucker and Tracy Rucinski)

Mitra-mandal Privacy Policy

This privacy policy has been compiled to better serve those who are concerned with how their  'Personally Identifiable Inform...